iPhone Medical News |
| The Regulatory Future of Mobile Medical Apps Posted: 24 Nov 2009 10:36 AM PST
“At a high-level, we look for two things: (1) a device with (2) a medical intended use. The first prong of the test — that there must be an actual product — means FDA doesn’t regulate, for example, medical procedures. The thing in question must be a thing, and not information or something else intangible. Software can be a medical device if it’s written on computer media, as opposed to printed on paper. The media with the code written on it is enough of a ‘thing’ for FDA to regulate,” Thomspon [Bradley Merrill Thompson, Partner at Epstein Becker & Green] writes. “In the area of mobile health technology, it’s important to understand that an accessory or a component of a medical device is itself a regulated medical device. Further, the difference between an accessory and a component is who buys it. End-users buy accessories, while manufacturers buy components. Thus the exact same piece of equipment could be either an accessory or a component depending on the target purchaser.” Link: When will the FDA drop the gavel? |
| You are subscribed to email updates from iPhone Medical News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Medical and health applications for iPhones, Blackberry devices, Android phones and other mobile gadgets already number in the thousands. The problem is that only one app,
No comments:
Post a Comment